Briony is the one responsible for the wrong act that needs atoning. A lot was running through this thirteen year old mind before setting out with this act. Firstly, she witnessed what seemed to her as sexual apprehension between her sister, Cecilia, and Robbie at a water fountain outside her window.
Great Texts of the Bible The Ethics of the Atonement Who his own self bare our sins in his body upon the tree, that we, having died unto sins, might live unto righteousness.
There is no subject so surrounded with difficulty and so fruitful of misrepresentation as the one which Passion Sunday suggests—the Atonement effected for us by Christ on the Cross. No thoughtful man can fail to be struck by the intense moral difficulties which its ordinary and naked presentment involves, and even when he has forced his way beyond them to some more rational standpoint, he still sees only a little light that is ever shading into mysterious darkness.
At the best our standpoint of knowledge is like a little island floating in a sea of mystery. There are many devout and intelligent Christians to whom it no longer appeals. They may still hold it as an article of their creed, but it is no longer the vital centre of their faith.
It is at best a profound mystery, which they must accept but can never hope to understand. Yet, as we read the New Testament, we feel that to the first Christians the Atonement was not a puzzle, but a revelation.
To Paul and John and Peter it was not an intellectual fog, but a glorious flood of light cast upon the fundamental facts of life. It will out, even when we least expect it, even when to minds void of Christian experience it would seem to mar the force of his argument.
Because Christ gave you the great example? There surely is the supreme motive for Christians. He cannot gaze at the Cross and speak thus. The punishment of Jesus became the power of Christian patience just at the point where there is no comparison between His sufferings and ours.
More remarkable still is the passage out of which our text is taken.
Here there can be no question that in the humility and patience of the Master the Apostle sees a motive for the endurance of the servant. Peter said this of one with whom he had lived, whose words he had noted, and with whom he had been in daily intercourse and communion.
And yet what a difficult, what a sharp and trying test this for such supernatural pretensions! To say of one person that His death was an atonement for the sins of the world, that He bore them in His own body on the cross, was to assert a profound and awful mystery respecting Him, because it is saying that the whole world was saved by His death; but to say this of one whom he had lived with and known—this is what we have no example of except in the testimony of the Apostles to Christ.
Now in considering the doctrine of vicarious suffering it is important to remember three things.
The ultimate efficacy of the sacrifice of Christ depends on what it does in us. The deep truths of Is. Christianity is stamped with the image of the Cross, and the whole life of each true Christian has something of the form and look of Christ crucified.
Let us first of all try to understand St. He has here four remarkable phrases. The priest of old brought a substitute, and it was a lamb. He struck the knife and the warm blood flowed, but our Lord Jesus Christ had no substitute for Himself. When the king travels, the newspapers sometimes tell us that Mr.
So-and-so, the superintendent of the line, drove the engine himself.
The word himself shows that he did then in person what he usually does by the hand of his servants. James Wells, Bible Echoes, Our Lord took up our sins, and in His own body which He offered on the cross He expiated them.
It must also be noted that when He took up our sins, He took them away, enabling us to be rid of them. First, representation; second, identification; third, substitution; and fourth, satisfaction. If we take those four conceptions—representation—one standing as a representative before God; identification—one being made identical with those he represents; substitution—one substituted in the place or stead of others; and satisfaction—the furnishing of a satisfying atonement in behalf of others,—we have the scope of the meaning of these words.
Pierson, The Hopes of the Gospel, The depth, the fulness, the perfection, of His Being and of His character endowed Him with capacities for suffering which transcend all our most powerful imaginings.
We can reach only imperfect, but still very significant, ideas of what He consciously realized in the Crucifixion.
So weak are our powers that great injury stupefies the senses to the pain belonging to it. His perfection of mind would support the sense of pain and intensify it.
And not only so, but every part of His Being would be quick, because of His fulness of life, to see and feel all that was contained within the act of men to Him.
The pains of the flesh would not so absorb His mind that He could not see and feel also the meaning of all that He endured in His body on the tree. Clear before Him would stand out the hate, the malice, the wrong of His murderers.
In the pain of the thorns He would be conscious of and would feel the cruel mockery of that shameful act.The Moral Theory of the atonement has considerable support in the more liberal wings of Christianity where it helps inspire believers to alleviate poverty, relieve suffering, and work for "liberty and justice for all" people including women as well as racial, religious, and sexual minorities.
The Ethics of the Atonement Who his own self bare our sins in his body upon the tree, that we, having died unto sins, might live unto righteousness.— 1 Peter There is no subject so surrounded with difficulty and so fruitful of misrepresentation as the one which Passion Sunday suggests—the Atonement effected for us by Christ on the Cross.
Related Documents: Essay on Atonement: Ethics and Briony Ethics: Ethics and Personnel Ethics Essay Personnel Ethics Ethics Professor In order to understand ethics lets define it. In Ethics and Atonement, W.
Lofthouse maintains that the doctrine of the atonement is not an artificial theorem or an inexplicable or unethical dogma, but that it has its roots in . Atonement is to compensate, amend or satisfy a wrong. Briony is the one responsible for the wrong act that needs atoning. A lot was running through this thirteen year old mind before setting out with this act.
The ability for any human being to be able to make an action like this and decide its right is a big flaw in moral relativism. This approach shows that lying is not termed as a moral absolute and it disregards the consequences of the action.